{
    "version" : "https://jsonfeed.org/version/1",
    "content" : "news",
    "type" : "single",
    "title" : "Build Empathy With Stakeholder Interviews, Part 2: Conversation |Digital.gov",
    "description": "Build Empathy With Stakeholder Interviews, Part 2: Conversation",
    "home_page_url" : "/preview/gsa/digitalgov.gov/bc-archive-content-3/","feed_url" : "/preview/gsa/digitalgov.gov/bc-archive-content-3/2016/07/29/build-empathy-with-stakeholder-interviews-part-2-conversation/index.json","item" : [
    {"title" :"Build Empathy With Stakeholder Interviews, Part 2: Conversation","deck" : "How to run user-interviews and synthesize and integrate the results into the teams shared understanding","summary" : "How to run user-interviews and synthesize and integrate the results into the teams shared understanding","date" : "2016-07-29T12:00:13-04:00","date_modified" : "2025-01-27T19:42:55-05:00","authors" : {"andrew-maier" : "Andrew Maier"},"topics" : {
        
            "content-strategy" : "Content strategy",
            "design" : "Design",
            "human-centered-design" : "Human-centered design",
            "research" : "Research",
            "user-experience" : "User experience"
            },"branch" : "bc-archive-content-3",
      "filename" :"2016-07-29-build-empathy-with-stakeholder-interviews-part-2-conversation.md",
      
      "filepath" :"news/2016/07/2016-07-29-build-empathy-with-stakeholder-interviews-part-2-conversation.md",
      "filepathURL" :"https://github.com/GSA/digitalgov.gov/blob/bc-archive-content-3/content/news/2016/07/2016-07-29-build-empathy-with-stakeholder-interviews-part-2-conversation.md",
      "editpathURL" :"https://github.com/GSA/digitalgov.gov/edit/bc-archive-content-3/content/news/2016/07/2016-07-29-build-empathy-with-stakeholder-interviews-part-2-conversation.md","slug" : "build-empathy-with-stakeholder-interviews-part-2-conversation","url" : "/preview/gsa/digitalgov.gov/bc-archive-content-3/2016/07/29/build-empathy-with-stakeholder-interviews-part-2-conversation/","content" :"\u003cp\u003eA few weeks ago, the State Department held its first conference dedicated to user experience design, UX Exponential. The conference organizers invited me to speak, and in this two-part series I hope to summarize (as best as possible) the presentation I gave, “\u003ca href=\"https://speakerdeck.com/andrewmaier/foster-the-people-building-empathy-with-stakeholder-interviews\"\u003eFoster The People: Building Empathy with Stakeholder Interviews\u003c/a\u003e.” \u003cdiv class=\"image\"\u003e\n  \u003cimg\n    src=\"https://s3.amazonaws.com/digitalgov/_legacy-img/2015/07/600-x-400-Social-Business-Meeting-Rawpixel-Ltd-iStock-Thinkstock-179604739.jpg\"\n    alt=\"Social Business Meeting\"/\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\n\n\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn the \u003ca href=\"https://18f.gsa.gov/2016/06/20/build-empathy-with-stakeholder-interviews-part-1-preparation/\"\u003efirst post of this series\u003c/a\u003e, I covered what stakeholder interviews are, why they’re valuable, and how to prepare for them. In this second post, I’ll cover how to actually run the interviews as well as some tips for synthesizing and socializing what you learn.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCool? Let’s dive right in.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2 id=\"running-the-interviews\"\u003eRunning the interviews\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOn the day before your interviews, double check that you’ve got everything you’ll need to show up on time and collect information. This includes:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe date, time, and location of your meetings, as well as transportation to and from them.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHow you’ll need to dress.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA print out of your questions (for reference).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAn informed consent and recording release document that uses \u003ca href=\"https://pages.18f.gov/content-guide/plain-language/\"\u003eplain language\u003c/a\u003e to describe how you plan to use the information you’ll collect (and how the agency maintains the information).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAn audio recording setup like those that come standard on most laptops and phones.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA video camera setup (I use my phone’s camera).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eA notepad and a pen.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNote that the list above calls for not only a notepad, but also a voice recorder and a camera. This might sound like wearing both a belt and suspenders, but it’s an intentional choice; stakeholder interviews present the opportunity to capture a bunch of information above and beyond direct responses. Capitalize on this opportunity. Any information you collect provides a more accurate representation of the people behind the interviews. (In the spirit of belts and suspenders, though, do test your recording setup before the interviews take place!)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSome researchers also like to share their documents — both their informed consent and their list of questions — with stakeholders a day or two before the interview. I personally don’t share the list of questions first so that I can get more spontaneous responses.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFinally, consider inviting a teammate or two along to the interviews. This not only helps demystify the research process, it also helps socialize what you’re learning in real time.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3 id=\"mind-the-gap\"\u003eMind the gap\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs you travel to your interviews, give yourself time to mentally prepare for them. Researcher Steve Portigal describes this as a “transition ritual:”\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cblockquote\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn the same way that interviews are not the same as everyday conversations, the time we spend with research participants is separate from the time we spend doing our “regular jobby stuff.” Transition rituals help interviewers switch contexts, providing a more objective interview.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor me, this sometimes means assembling the materials and equipment, checking that I have the documents, etc. That’s sufficient. For someone else, they might want to remind themselves that what they are about to do is focus on the participant. That also has the benefit of reminding them to let go of the stuff-at-the-office: the report they have to give, the meetings they’re missing, etc.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/blockquote\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTransition rituals help clear your head and get you in a frame of mind where you can practice humble inquiry and active listening — both are essential skills for a successful interview.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3 id=\"off-to-the-races\"\u003eOff to the races\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://18f.gsa.gov/2016/06/20/build-empathy-with-stakeholder-interviews-part-1-preparation/\"\u003eAs I mentioned in part one\u003c/a\u003e, many interviews ebb and flow based on the questions you ask and the tasks you observe. That said, there are some things that should always happen:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThank people for their time.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eExplain the purpose of your research — to better understand the problem(s) you’re trying to solve — and the scope of your work.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eObtain the participant’s signature on your informed consent and recording release, then turn on your recording device and ask for permission (on the record) to record.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRemind stakeholders that participation in this usability study is voluntary, and that they should feel free to raise any concerns or areas of discomfort during the session. Let them know that you can stop or pause the recording at any time. If you’re going to transcribe the interview — which I try do for every interview I conduct; more on this below — let your interviewee know that they’ll get a chance to review the transcript before you share it with the project team.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAsk stakeholders to talk about themselves. Ask your stakeholder how they got involved in the thing you’re studying.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLook people in the eye and give positive affirmations. Lean forward. Say things like “Wow,” or “Oh, interesting!” (when those reactions genuinely occur to you, of course).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTake simple notes to show you’re paying attention. Be sure to note the exact words and phrases people use. Maybe say their own words back to them with a slight lilt (for example, if they say “I run the TPS reports every Friday,” you might respond “Run the TPS reports every Friday?” to see if they’ll explain further).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDon’t reference your interview questions if you can help it. Instead, let the conversation flow naturally, and try and get people to tell stories — yes, stories — that relate to the thing you’re studying.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRemember to ask “how” and “why” multiple times, and to provide blank space to give them time to think. Anna Sale, who runs the Death, Sex, and Money podcast, has some advice on how to strategically deploy awkward pauses to dive deeper — and rather than trying to summarize it here I’ll just link to \u003ca href=\"https://youtu.be/oi5ufy3RguM?t=45m28s\"\u003ethe video\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFinish up with “is there anything I forgot to ask?” Remind stakeholders that you’re going to talk to other people and it might be useful for you to ask a certain question as you go forward as a kind of informal poll. Also ask “do you have any questions for me?” Write these responses down.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThank your participant, turn off the recorder, and provide them with your contact information (if they need it). Let them know if or when you might to follow up with them throughout the duration of the project.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e\n\u003ch2 id=\"synthesize-and-socialize\"\u003eSynthesize and socialize\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe hard part’s done! Yay! Now what?\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRecall that the goals of this work are to raise important questions, surface constraints, build trust, and drive alignment. While the very act of conducting interviews gets you halfway there, interviews alone are not enough.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn order to really reap the benefits of stakeholder interviews, you’ll need to document your interviews and socialize what you’ve learned. This can happen a number of ways. Some designers, for example, use what they learn during stakeholder interviews to hold a kickoff meeting around a (now) more well-defined problem. Other designers use what they learn to run workshops or to inform their existing research or product design. I personally prefer to transcribe interviews.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn the world of user-centered design, transcribed interviews are one of the closest things you can get to “primary source” documents; they’re authentic accounts of the actual experiences you’re working to improve. Transcribed interviews are also really useful for sharing back with stakeholders. Everyone loves to read things that they said — they might regret it, or they might be proud of it, but they definitely want to read it. Further, sharing transcripts back with stakeholders builds trust by showing that you’ve actually listened to them, that you respect their ability to speak for themselves, and that their feedback will been taken into account and shared more broadly. What’s more, stakeholders usually add information after the fact!\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs each stakeholder edits and amends their respective transcript, share that transcript with your team. I personally prefer to do this in little chunks so as to prompt more focused conversations. After your team has had a chance to emotionally process the interviews, hold a meeting to derive each stakeholder’s goals, behaviors, and pain points (based on what they said and what you’ve observed). Finally, consider holding a team meeting to compare what stakeholders said vs. your original assumptions about them (the “what,” “how,” and “why,” identified in \u003ca href=\"https://18f.gsa.gov/2016/06/20/build-empathy-with-stakeholder-interviews-part-1-preparation/\"\u003epart 1\u003c/a\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3 id=\"next-steps\"\u003eNext steps\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eStakeholder interviews, their application as well as their synthesis, can vary wildly depending on the circumstances surrounding the projects to which they’re applied.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eI’ve conducted stakeholder interviews on all of my projects over my past year at 18F, and each of them has resulted in a different kind of synthesis. On smaller projects I’ve gone straight to prototyping. On our recent \u003ca href=\"https://18f.gsa.gov/2015/12/01/how-we-dramatically-improved-18fs-onboarding-process-in-3-months/\"\u003eonboarding sprint\u003c/a\u003e, Melody Kramer and I quickly realized that everyone had a slightly different understanding of the problem we were trying to solve — so we facilitated a collaborative \u003ca href=\"https://methods.18f.gov/decide/journey-mapping/\"\u003ejourney mapping\u003c/a\u003e session. On 18F’s practice team, successive rounds of stakeholder interviews led to further research. After a lively internal debate, our team conducted a \u003ca href=\"https://methods.18f.gov/discover/design-studio/\"\u003edesign studio\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMany teams are so anxious to get things started that they blow right past stakeholder interviews and rush to a kickoff meeting where everyone has a different understanding of the problem being solved. Don’t do this. Not only does this risk disenfranchising stakeholders, it also runs the risk of reinscribing the same patterns that led to the need for the project in the first place. Stakeholder interviews provide us with an opportunity to do things differently.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eProducts are only as successful as the markets they inhabit. Properly executed, stakeholder interviews help us inform our understanding and meet people where they’re at. That way everyone moves forward, together.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch4 id=\"citations\"\u003eCitations\u003c/h4\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eThese resources provided information for this series. This list does not represent an endorsement of these resources by 18F or the General Services Administration.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch5 id=\"books\"\u003eBooks\u003c/h5\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHumble Inquiry: The Gentle Art of Asking Instead of Telling, by Edgar H. Schein\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eInterviewing Users, by Steve Portigal\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJust Enough Research, by Erika Hall\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWell Designed: How to Use Empathy to Create Products People Love, by Jon Kolko\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003ch5 id=\"video\"\u003eVideo\u003c/h5\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://youtu.be/oi5ufy3RguM?t=45m28s\"\u003eAnna Sale’s advice to interviewers\u003c/a\u003e on YouTube_This post was originally published on the \u003ca href=\"https://18f.gsa.gov/blog/\"\u003e18F blog\u003c/a\u003e._\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n"}
  ]
}